Warrior Fury 2h build - Imp. Berserk rage or 2hand spec?

[Fandom]

Going for 2hand fury spec, aiming mostly on damage and some pvp versality (to make up for the lack of mortal strike etc.).
http://www.wow-europe.com/en/info/basics/talents/warrior/talents.html?0230502030200000000550310400501225100 000000000000000
is what i've chose for a spec, yet i haven't picked imp. berserker rage, cause i wonder if 2 talent points in 2hand weapon spec would be overally better (especially for pve dps).
What do you think on the matter?
2% extra dmg or +10 rage on berserker rage?

(mind the factor of getting used to 10rage on demand, then losing it when going back on MS spec :( that must suck hehe)

[Noktyn]

31/20.

[Soulless]

31/20.

qft

[Fandom]

enough with cookie cutter :P

[Noktyn]

enough with cookie cutter :P

Enough with terrible fucking fury specs.

[Otzo]

Enough with terrible fucking fury specs.

Amen

[Fandom]

Enough with terrible fucking fury specs.

dude you really should change your avatar.

Currently testing fury 2h, went with berserk rage to evaluate that as well. Works pretty good in pve, now for pvp we'll see.

[Traumatize]

dude you really should change your avatar.

Currently testing fury 2h, went with berserk rage to evaluate that as well. Works pretty good in pve, now for pvp we'll see.

Imo berserkers rage, because a rage bonus on such a short cd is well worth the talents.
Anyway i agree with noktyn.

[Apocalyptica]

berserker rage, the rage bonus is nice

myself tested a fury specc for 2hours in bwl, after ebonroc i used hearthstone und specced back to ms :>

[^Deman]

fury requiers another gear setup and more than 2 hours of testing,but it does more dmg than ms 31/20

[Traumatize]

fury requiers another gear setup and more than 2 hours of testing,but it does more dmg than ms 31/20

In a pve enviroment, yes.

In pvp fury is /lol.

[keboman]

I don't think it matters a whole lot in most PVE. Warriors have no -agro other than berserker and battle stance and can run into their damage cap pretty fast (at least with windfury).

[The Arc]

31/20 >>>>>>>>>>> dual wield fury >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2h fury

[Lesly]

Enough with terrible fucking fury specs.


your avatar SUCKS ....

17/34/0 <- roxx

[Traumatize]

your avatar SUCKS ....

17/34/0 <- roxx

How about no

[uro]

PVE yes, PVP no

[Lesly]

yes pve = best !

[Lodekim]

With WF 31/20 does about as much as fury, can even do more sometimes, and is better in pvp, why would you not spec 31/20 if you're not speccing prot?

[Traumatize]

With WF 31/20 does about as much as fury, can even do more sometimes, and is better in pvp, why would you not spec 31/20 if you're not speccing prot?

Only problem is that wf is one badass agromagnet. In other words, vs most raidencounters wf-support isn't possible, so the regular 31/20 ends up getting its damage gimped.
Fury on the other hand can perform great dps without wf support.

However I agree with you completely on the pvp part.

[Lodekim]

Only problem is that wf is one badass agromagnet. In other words, vs most raidencounters wf-support isn't possible, so the regular 31/20 ends up getting its damage gimped.
Fury on the other hand can perform great dps without wf support.

However I agree with you completely on the pvp part.

If you can't get windfury in your group (whether cause you're alliance or because of not enough shamans) yeah Fury will out dps standard MS spec, but we only stick our newbie warriors in groups without WF, you know, the ones who just joined and are still in around half blues.

[Fandom]

From my testing these days, 2h fury is mediocre :S
Speccing DW asap for the ++in pve dps (yeah, 31/20 is the_best spec for pvp, hands down).

[Dunderdon]

if you really wanna try it

id use unbridled wrath
even with 2h fury, flurry will make it a little more usefull for 2handers

[RubiksCube]

2h Fury does outdamage MS in PvE

It does not however outdamage MS in PvP, because a 1000 dmgmortalstrike has to be healed as if it was 2000 dmg.

Thus MS > 2h Fury or DW Fury or whatever

QED

And wtf is up with you using the GM 1h Swords for dual wield fury. If you're gonna use GM weapons at least use the fists for style.

[The Arc]

2h Fury does outdamage MS in PvE

It does not however outdamage MS in PvP, because a 1000 dmgmortalstrike has to be healed as if it was 2000 dmg.

Thus MS > 2h Fury or DW Fury or whatever

QED

And wtf is up with you using the GM 1h Swords for dual wield fury. If you're gonna use GM weapons at least use the fists for style.

Could be worse, he could be horde and using those 1h swords. Wtf @ that graphic.

[^Deman]

Rubic...

seen a n811 using R14 fist weapons?
looks lika a 70 year old drunk grandpa trying to catch some flyes

[Fandom]

Rubic:
The fist weapons are good looking but bugged as hell. Looks silly wielding them and they sometimes bug-off and look like punching the guy, without a fist weapon. They blink back on after a sec, but okay.

2 swords = best looks period.