View Full Version : Which one is better?
Soulless
12-28-2005, 08:16 PM
Julie's Dagger
or
Lobotomizer
From a tanking point of view?
I'm thinking Julie's is a little better because of the speed and the proc, but lobotomizer is...well...Epic!
I can't decide :\
Soulless
12-28-2005, 08:47 PM
I know, but atm my only choices are those 2.
I'll properbly use julies till I get bloodlords, but it's a shame I wasted 130g on lobotomizer. :|
Lobo to miss off nub dagger rogues not yet exalted with AV. =p its fun sometimes. :p
dragonboy
12-29-2005, 08:10 AM
how about a Thunderfury dagger (http://www.thottbot.com/index.cgi?i=3780) ? :)
Soulless
12-29-2005, 09:37 AM
how about a Thunderfury dagger (http://www.thottbot.com/index.cgi?i=3780) ? :)
How about..NO.
:|
RubiksCube
12-29-2005, 10:07 AM
I'd take Lobo for the DPS.... and for general Epicness.
Rickert
01-01-2006, 07:17 AM
how about a Thunderfury dagger (http://www.thottbot.com/index.cgi?i=3780) ? :)
I know it was ment as a joke, but just for info.
I actually used that dagger for a while (its been quite some time, when the first guilds started mc to be exact) and it was horrible.
Procs very rare and had a lot of rage problems.
So to anyone whos looking for a tanking weapon at that equip level, go for silent fang ( i switched to zerathil since i was axe specced).
Oh the memories =(
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.9 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.