View Full Version : Hand of Rag or Thunderfury
azzyboi
08-12-2006, 12:27 PM
Ok so i was asked which i would prefer last night by the head hanco of my guild. Trouble is im not sure which i would like.. as a warrior i could pvp / pve dmg / pvp with thunderfury, but only our MT has it atm (both bindings in 1 mc). Where as HoR i could pve dmg (<3 aedak) and pvp. I am fury atm but cant make the decision >.<
Ralrra
08-12-2006, 12:34 PM
Do you have any desire to be a primary tank? If yes take thunderfury, if no don't take it.
azzyboi
08-12-2006, 12:45 PM
Well i am some what one of our most active warriors in the guild. Does it really pull that much aggro vs constant 2k crits with a hand of rag?
Ralrra
08-12-2006, 12:50 PM
you're misunderstanding me. Thunderfury is still argueably the best tank weapon in the game due to the debuff associated with the proc.
For main tanks the Faerlina sword is better, and thunderfury becomes a good offhand for fury warriors and rogues.
azzyboi
08-12-2006, 01:59 PM
Im not going to be MT or anything, our MT just got both bindings. Im talking damage mainly (i could klutch tank with tf though)
Anduryondon
08-12-2006, 04:58 PM
For main tanks the Faerlina sword is better, and thunderfury becomes a good offhand for fury warriors and rogues.
tf aggro>remorse aggro
Faerlina sword still gives more stamina, and stamina > some thunderfury aggro which the main tank doesn't need to MT, unless he sucks.
Traumatize
08-12-2006, 06:55 PM
Sulfuras is really outdated.
bierbaum
08-13-2006, 02:42 AM
TF is just good for Enrage mobs (TF > Maexxna) so i would just get it if i would be maintank ( i would puke if my raid had 4 or 5 tf hi @ procville).
But i would get tf just because it looks kickass.
khan3817
08-13-2006, 06:10 AM
TF.
Soruss
08-14-2006, 04:57 PM
Sulfuras is really outdated.
Since when is 372 top end out dated? HoR still hits damn hard.
Traumatize
08-15-2006, 05:57 AM
Since when is 372 top end out dated? HoR still hits damn hard.
Since Ashkandi became a common weapon, and even more so when AQ40 was released.
Skalathrax
08-16-2006, 02:20 AM
i think, since the change to TF in the next patch, it has become more attractive for fury warriors again, but to be honest, these "legendary" weapons arent that exciting anymore. to my mind at least
Soruss
08-16-2006, 12:59 PM
Since Ashkandi became a common weapon, and even more so when AQ40 was released.
If Blizzard made mace spec worthwhile, you'd probably be singing a different tune.
Traumatize
08-16-2006, 02:25 PM
If Blizzard made mace spec worthwhile, you'd probably be singing a different tune.
Maybe. Doesn't change the fact that it's fucking expensive and not worth it.
azzyboi
08-16-2006, 05:54 PM
Yeah what if you can get the hammer right after the eye? Like the guild already has its mats and its free to you?
Skalathrax
08-16-2006, 11:12 PM
then id wonder what reasons there are to say "no please, i wanna stick to my shitty weapon"
assuming, youre not rank 14 or comparable
Traumatize
08-17-2006, 03:50 AM
Yeah what if you can get the hammer right after the eye? Like the guild already has its mats and its free to you?
Thunderfury is better and will help your guild progress.
But if you use some suckass weapon then take HoR I guess, your call. There's like, let's see, 5 other weapons with the same-ish damage but better stats and spec around though.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.9 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.